Public Washrooms: essential ideology (with help from Zizek)
by Michelle Lovegrove Thomson on March 12, 20112 comments
I must write an essay on the organization of a particular object for one of my Library school courses. The object in question could be anything: grocery store, smartphone, Facebook… We are to show how the way an object is constructed affects the way we interact with it physically and mentally, and also how its organization tells us something about those who constructed it (basic ontology/epistemology). In light of Ottawa recently passing the Bathroom Bill to amend the Human Rights Act and and Criminal Code to ban discrimination based on gender identity, I immediately thought: why not a semiotics of the public washroom from a Queer perspective.
A surprising amount of ink has been spilled about the social codes and physical design of public toilets. I had a queer critique based on Judith Halberstam’s work in mind, but also planned to incorporate York prof Sheila Cavanagh’s recently published Queering Bathrooms: Gender, Sexuality and the Hygienic Imagination. Once I began researching–that is, spending approx 35 minutes using my favourite resources, Google and the UToronto library catalogue–I discovered a veritable poo-poo platter of writings on this most essential of topics: how do we organize public, private spaces?
NYU’s Laura Noren (under the name “flaneuse”, *heart*) runs a sociology/graphic design blog, which includes an excellent and brief article on better bathroom design. Noren has also edited, with NYU colleague Harvey Molotch (writer of award-winning article Peeing in Public) a collection entitled Toilet: Public Restrooms and the Politics of Sharing which I hope to get my hands on.
Of course, all good researchers know that one’s search is not truly thorough if it does not lead you to that continental jack-of-all-opinions, Slavoj Zizek. I present to you this near-perfect analysis of the organization of public washrooms. Unlike Zizek, I would argue that ideology is clearly at work the moment you must choose the “appropriate” sign to represent yourself. That being said, I present to you, in 2 minutes or less, bathroom ideology from the semiotic triangle to the pubic triangle. Thanks, Zizek.







2 comments
Jason on March 12, 2011 at 8:53 pm. #
I doubt Zizek would disagree about the moment you choose the sign–that example is straight out of Lacan. Of course, Lacan would never move from excremental inspection to the stylings of pubic hair in quite so direct a way.
Matthew Payne on March 13, 2011 at 11:15 am. #
I have to say, given the American style of chosing its elites, the idea that shit floats is more ideological than even Zizek even believes. I gotta wonder where the former Soviet bloc fits in this typology. The shelf thing is definitely in play, ala German but more “modern” toilets are American. Do we have a globalization of execrement going on here and therefore an end of ideology?
As for the pubic hair thing–this seems very old-fashioned to me. Haven’t we commodified the whole deal with Brazilian Wax Huts and what not? I know plenty of guys in the gym who wax as well, especially gay guys. Isn’t this an attempt, ala Triste Topique (I can hear Nick groaning from half a continent away) to sublimate the savage and the beast within?
Serious questions, folks. “Cuz really, I don’t know. I can tell you too being the father of girls that whenever I have had to bring them (usually as very young girls–now I just stand guard like some pedophile outside of door) they’ve been fascinated and horrified by the men’s room’s equipment. Especially the ones with the old-style tub pissoirs.